Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Reservation’

More cream in OBC creamy layer

November 4th, 2008

The Central Government has decided to extend some more benefit to the Other Backward Castes (OBC).The Union Cabinet met on Friday and decided to increase the income limit of creamy layer of OBCs from Rs 2.5 lakh to Rs 4.5 lakh per annum.

However, the government’s decision goes against a Supreme Court judgment which said that vacant OBC seats in higher education institutes be de-reserved to accommodate general category students.

The National Commission for Backward Classes had in July this year recommended Rs 4.5 lakh as the practical ceiling limit for exclusion of the creamy layer among OBCs from reservation benefits.

The Commission took into account the recommendations of the sixth pay commission, besides criteria like the all-India consumer price index, price rise, inflation rate, monthly per capita expenditure of the OBCs, economic conditions of the OBCs and per capita national product before arriving at a decision on the new ceiling.

The commission also considered the views expressed by representatives of the various state backward class commissions and secretaries in charge of the related departments of the states and union territories.

Most of the states had in a conference here earlier demanded the new ceiling be fixed between Rs 4 and Rs 6 lakh. Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh had, however, demanded higher ceilings of Rs 25 lakh and Rs 10 lakh, respectively.

Share

, ,

OBC vacant seats should go to general category – SC

November 4th, 2008

The Supreme Court on Monday clarified that if seats reserved for other backward class (OBCs) students in central educational institutions remained vacant for want of eligible candidates, such seats must be allotted to general category candidates reports the Hindustan TImes

A five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India KG Balakrishnan, which upheld the OBC quota law on April 10, said such vacant seats, out of the 27 per cent reserved for OBC students, couldn’t be carried forward to the next academic year.

“Our judgment clearly said don’t allow seats to be vacant. That will be counter-productive… the anxiety was to see that seats should not go waste,” Justice Arijit Pasayat, a member of the bench, said, adjourning the matter to October 14.  The court has yet to pass any formal orders.

The observation came after Solicitor General GE Vahanvati referred to the judgment of Justice Dalveer Bhandari, another member of the bench. Vahanvati said that if nine per cent seats were increased every year to give effect to the 27 per cent OBC quota, only vacant seats accumulated at the end of the third year would be filled by the general category.

But the court didn’t agree with the Centre’s stand that unfilled OBC seats should be accumulated for three years before being allotted to general students, if they ultimately remained vacant. The court wondered why the government wanted to wait three years to fill the seats.

The bench was hearing an application by Professor PV Indersen of IIT-Chennai seeking clarifications in the Constitution bench judgment. He had alleged that several seats remained vacant as the HRD Ministry did not follow the SC ruling.

Senior counsel KK Venugopal pointed out on behalf of anti-quota petitioners that the issue of cut-off marks had been settled by the bench and institutions had accepted that difference in cut-off for OBC and general category students will be not more than five to 10 marks.

According to the Centre’s affidavit, Jawaharlal Nehru University has filled 54 vacant OBC seats with general category candidates while 29 such seats are vacant. Out of the 654 seats available for OBCs in 13 IITs, only 20 remain vacant but the cut-off (172 for both general and OBC) wasn’t diluted.

Share

, ,